Immigrants from Micronesia vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,578,351 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $53,737, a difference of 13.5%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $47,380, a difference of 7.0%), and median male earnings ($47,177 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($90,345 compared to $90,543, a difference of 0.22%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $87,255, a difference of 0.70%), and median household income ($75,574 compared to $74,279, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 22.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.0% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.30%), married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and single father poverty (18.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 16.2%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.16, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (27.2% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.1%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.76%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 19.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and professional degree (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 44.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 0.53%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 0.67%).