Slovak vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Slovak
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Slovaks

Iroquois

Good
Fair
6,550
SOCIAL INDEX
63.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
150th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Slovak Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,931,416 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to an increase of 1.1 Iroquois.
Slovak Integration in Iroquois Communities

Slovak vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,029 compared to $87,255, a difference of 15.8%), wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.2%), and median family income ($103,729 compared to $90,543, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $47,380, a difference of 5.0%), median female earnings ($39,029 compared to $36,408, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $53,737, a difference of 9.9%).
Slovak vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricSlovakIroquois
Per Capita Income
Good
$44,229
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Good
$103,729
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,798
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Good
$47,095
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,306
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$39,029
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,753
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,032
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$101,029
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Poor
$59,039
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.9%
Excellent
25.1%

Slovak vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.8%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 35.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (14.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.8%), single father poverty (19.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 8.8%), and single mother poverty (30.4% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 14.6%).
Slovak vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricSlovakIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.7%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Fair
17.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Fair
21.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.4%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
13.5%

Slovak vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.4%), female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Slovak vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSlovakIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
4.8%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Average
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.8%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%

Slovak vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Slovak vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSlovakIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.9%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
42.6%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.7%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Tragic
80.6%

Slovak vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 16.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 1.4%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.06 compared to 3.16, a difference of 3.1%).
Slovak vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSlovakIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.7%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.06
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.3%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.4%
Tragic
38.2%

Slovak vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.3%).
Slovak vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSlovakIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.3%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Good
6.5%

Slovak vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 40.2%), master's degree (14.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
Slovak vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricSlovakIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Average
46.3%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Average
14.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Tragic
1.6%

Slovak vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.7%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and female disability (13.3% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Slovak vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricSlovakIroquois
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.5%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.8%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Poor
2.5%
Tragic
2.7%