Samoan vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,365,537 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.011% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 11.4 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $53,737, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($86,498 compared to $74,279, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $87,255, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,826 compared to $39,104, a difference of 1.8%), median female earnings ($37,498 compared to $36,408, a difference of 3.0%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 30.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 14.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 17.1%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.78%), currently married (46.8% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.7%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 43.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 42.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 12.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 20.1%), master's degree (11.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.2% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.11%), ged/equivalency (84.9% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.8% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%).