Ecuadorian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,711,430 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.024. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to an increase of 0.6 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $47,380, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($82,070 compared to $74,279, a difference of 10.5%), and wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $53,737, a difference of 2.3%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.5%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $90,543, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 21.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.0%), and single female poverty (21.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.53%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (15.3% compared to 15.8%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.7%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 14.8%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 0.62%), currently married (43.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 107.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 30.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 38.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 57.0%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (43.0% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 0.36%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.2%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.5%).