Bolivian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Bolivian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Bolivians

Iroquois

Excellent
Fair
8,880
SOCIAL INDEX
86.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
42nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Bolivian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 105,808,331 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Bolivian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bolivians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bolivians corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Iroquois.
Bolivian Integration in Iroquois Communities

Bolivian vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($74,245 compared to $53,737, a difference of 38.2%), median household income ($102,195 compared to $74,279, a difference of 37.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,871 compared to $87,255, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 6.8%), median female earnings ($43,445 compared to $36,408, a difference of 19.3%), and median earnings ($52,005 compared to $42,430, a difference of 22.6%).
Bolivian vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricBolivianIroquois
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,526
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$119,479
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$102,195
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,066
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,445
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$58,506
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$109,372
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$118,871
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$74,245
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
26.8%
Excellent
25.1%

Bolivian vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.8% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 59.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 52.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.6% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 20.3%), single father poverty (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 21.6%).
Bolivian vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricBolivianIroquois
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
25.9%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.3%
Tragic
13.5%

Bolivian vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (5.9% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 27.0%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.50%).
Bolivian vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBolivianIroquois
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.7%

Bolivian vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 10.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%).
Bolivian vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBolivianIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.7%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.0%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
80.6%

Bolivian vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 34.3%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.16, a difference of 4.1%), family households (66.5% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 6.8%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 7.5%).
Bolivian vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBolivianIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
66.5%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.5%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.2%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Excellent
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.1%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
38.2%

Bolivian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.7%).
Bolivian vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBolivianIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.3%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.8%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Good
6.5%

Bolivian vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 51.8%), master's degree (19.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 49.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.2% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (89.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.55%).
Bolivian vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricBolivianIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.2%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.2%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.4%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.7%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.5%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.0%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.6%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
1.6%

Bolivian vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bolivian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 60.5%), hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 42.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 7.2%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 21.3%).
Bolivian vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricBolivianIroquois
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.0%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.2%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%