Icelander vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Icelander
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Icelanders
Iroquois
8,070
SOCIAL INDEX
78.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
89th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Icelander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,256,099 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Icelander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.904. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Icelanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.135% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Icelanders corresponds to an increase of 135.5 Iroquois.
Icelander vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Icelander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,261 compared to $87,255, a difference of 17.2%), median household income ($85,797 compared to $74,279, a difference of 15.5%), and median family income ($104,282 compared to $90,543, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,109 compared to $36,408, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,247 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.2%), and wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 9.5%).
Income Metric | Icelander | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Excellent $44,987 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Good $104,282 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Good $85,797 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Good $46,916 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Good $55,415 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,109 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,247 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $95,560 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,261 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,270 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.5% | Excellent 25.1% |
Icelander vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Icelander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 34.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 30.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.5% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 6.7%), single male poverty (12.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 16.3%).
Poverty Metric | Icelander | Iroquois |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.5% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.3% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.3% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Fair 29.5% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.5% |
Icelander vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Icelander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 32.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.56%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Icelander | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Excellent 4.7% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Icelander vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Icelander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.62%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Icelander | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Good 84.8% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Tragic 80.6% |
Icelander vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Icelander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 26.0%), single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.87%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Icelander | Iroquois |
Family Households | Tragic 63.3% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Good 47.0% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.3% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 38.2% |
Icelander vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.2%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 13.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 10.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Icelander | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.6% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.0% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Good 6.5% |
Icelander vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Icelander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 29.5%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.5%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.16%).
Education Level Metric | Icelander | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.7% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.6% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.5% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.1% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.3% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Excellent 39.5% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Good 15.5% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Icelander vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Icelander and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 26.3%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 9.3%).
Disability Metric | Icelander | Iroquois |
Disability | Fair 11.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Poor 11.6% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Excellent 12.0% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Poor 5.7% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.1% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.4% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.6% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.7% |