Thai vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,690,298 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.182. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to an increase of 1.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($110,648 compared to $74,279, a difference of 49.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $87,255, a difference of 48.5%), and median male earnings ($72,135 compared to $49,374, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 21.5%), householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $47,380, a difference of 24.9%), and median female earnings ($47,577 compared to $36,408, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 78.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (11.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 72.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (11.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 22.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 28.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 15.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 59.0%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 35.3%), and single mother households (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.0%), family households (67.2% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 7.9%), and currently married (50.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 73.1%), master's degree (21.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 68.4%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 66.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.0%), 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 67.3%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 49.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.7%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 26.8%).