Welsh vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 202,506,347 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Welsh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.428. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Welsh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.071% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Welsh corresponds to an increase of 70.9 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Welsh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 15.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,322 compared to $87,255, a difference of 15.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,666 compared to $53,737, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,856 compared to $36,408, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,597 compared to $47,380, a difference of 6.8%), and median earnings ($45,710 compared to $42,430, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Welsh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 32.9%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.6%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.48%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Welsh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.5%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Welsh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.3% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.58%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Welsh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.0% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 19.3%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and married-couple households (48.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 53.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Welsh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 28.3%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 18.6%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), nursery school (98.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and kindergarten (98.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Welsh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 15.6%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.27%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.2%).