Australian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,563,118 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.669. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.180% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 179.6 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $39,104, a difference of 33.2%), median family income ($118,440 compared to $90,543, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,533 compared to $87,255, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $47,380, a difference of 13.4%), and median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $36,408, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 42.0%), receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 40.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 10.5%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 29.3%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 25.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.13 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.82%), family households (62.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 8.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.92%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 59.3%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 50.1%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 42.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 33.4%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 5.4%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.1%).