Potawatomi vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Potawatomi

Iroquois

Fair
Fair
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Potawatomi Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,967,739 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Potawatomi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.159. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Potawatomi within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Potawatomi corresponds to a decrease of 11.8 Iroquois.
Potawatomi Integration in Iroquois Communities

Potawatomi vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 10.6%), median female earnings ($34,739 compared to $36,408, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($84,613 compared to $87,255, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,212 compared to $53,737, a difference of 0.88%), median male earnings ($48,768 compared to $49,374, a difference of 1.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($46,462 compared to $47,380, a difference of 2.0%).
Potawatomi vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricPotawatomiIroquois
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,046
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$88,265
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$72,576
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,288
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,768
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,739
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,462
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$81,774
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$84,613
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,212
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Excellent
25.1%

Potawatomi vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 15.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and single male poverty (15.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.18%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 0.99%), and single female poverty (25.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Potawatomi vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricPotawatomiIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
23.7%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.5%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.0%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
34.1%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Poor
5.5%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Average
12.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Poor
12.5%
Tragic
13.5%

Potawatomi vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%).
Potawatomi vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPotawatomiIroquois
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Good
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Average
10.3%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.7%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.5%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.7%

Potawatomi vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.96%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.57%).
Potawatomi vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPotawatomiIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.2%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.0%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.2%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.7%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.0%
Tragic
80.6%

Potawatomi vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.4%), births to unmarried women (36.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.21%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 3.1%).
Potawatomi vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPotawatomiIroquois
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Poor
45.7%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.16
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Poor
6.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.2%
Tragic
38.2%

Potawatomi vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 12.5%).
Potawatomi vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPotawatomiIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.8%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.3%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.0%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.9%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.3%
Good
6.5%

Potawatomi vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.7%), master's degree (12.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 6.9%), and associate's degree (40.4% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.030%), ged/equivalency (84.7% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (92.8% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Potawatomi vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricPotawatomiIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.3%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
91.0%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Average
89.0%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.8%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
54.6%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
40.4%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
31.9%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Potawatomi vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Potawatomi and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 11.4%), disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (14.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.48%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Potawatomi vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricPotawatomiIroquois
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
4.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.0%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%