Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Panama
Iroquois
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Panama
Iroquois
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,202,265 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.131% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 130.8 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($80,873 compared to $74,279, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $87,255, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $49,374, a difference of 5.2%), median family income ($95,647 compared to $90,543, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $53,737, a difference of 6.0%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Iroquois |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,853 | Tragic $39,104 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,647 | Tragic $90,543 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $80,873 | Tragic $74,279 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,198 | Tragic $42,430 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,962 | Tragic $49,374 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,049 | Tragic $36,408 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $51,278 | Tragic $47,380 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,451 | Tragic $83,682 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,815 | Tragic $87,255 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,944 | Tragic $53,737 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 23.4% | Excellent 25.1% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.8%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.57%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Iroquois |
Poverty | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 14.5% |
Families | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 10.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.1% | Tragic 13.2% |
Females | Tragic 14.4% | Tragic 15.8% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.4% | Tragic 22.9% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Poor 14.1% | Tragic 17.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.5% | Tragic 22.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 19.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 20.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.9% | Tragic 17.7% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.8% | Tragic 34.8% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 11.9% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 13.9% | Tragic 14.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Iroquois |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Poor 5.4% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.7% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.4% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.3% | Average 17.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 7.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.0% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Poor 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Iroquois |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Tragic 63.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Tragic 77.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.0% | Exceptional 39.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.9% | Excellent 75.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Tragic 83.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 84.0% | Tragic 83.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Tragic 80.6% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Iroquois |
Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Tragic 62.2% |
Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Tragic 26.1% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.6% | Tragic 43.7% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.27 | Tragic 3.16 |
Single Father Households | Average 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Tragic 44.9% | Tragic 44.7% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.9% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.2% | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Iroquois |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.6% | Poor 10.9% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 85.4% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 51.1% | Fair 54.7% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.7% | Average 19.4% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Good 6.5% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.8%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Iroquois |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 97.8% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.6% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.2% | Exceptional 96.3% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.4% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.3% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.3% | Average 91.1% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Average 89.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Tragic 84.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 63.4% | Tragic 62.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Tragic 56.2% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Tragic 42.8% |
Bachelor's Degree | Poor 36.2% | Tragic 33.2% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.3% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Tragic 1.6% |
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Panama | Iroquois |
Disability | Poor 11.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Males | Poor 11.5% | Tragic 13.6% |
Females | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.0% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Tragic 1.5% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Good 6.5% | Tragic 7.9% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.6% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Tragic 25.4% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 48.4% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 18.2% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.7% |