Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Panama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Iroquois
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Panama

Iroquois

Poor
Fair
1,936
SOCIAL INDEX
16.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
282nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,526
SOCIAL INDEX
22.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
253rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Iroquois Integration in Immigrants from Panama Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,202,265 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Panama communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.670. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Panama within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.131% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Panama corresponds to an increase of 130.8 Iroquois.
Immigrants from Panama Integration in Iroquois Communities

Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($80,873 compared to $74,279, a difference of 8.9%), householder income under 25 years ($51,278 compared to $47,380, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,815 compared to $87,255, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($51,962 compared to $49,374, a difference of 5.2%), median family income ($95,647 compared to $90,543, a difference of 5.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,944 compared to $53,737, a difference of 6.0%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PanamaIroquois
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,853
Tragic
$39,104
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,647
Tragic
$90,543
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,873
Tragic
$74,279
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,198
Tragic
$42,430
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,962
Tragic
$49,374
Median Female Earnings
Fair
$39,049
Tragic
$36,408
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$51,278
Tragic
$47,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,451
Tragic
$83,682
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$93,815
Tragic
$87,255
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,944
Tragic
$53,737
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.4%
Excellent
25.1%

Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 23.8%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 19.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.5% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.9% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 0.57%), receiving food stamps (13.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 4.1%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PanamaIroquois
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
14.5%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Tragic
10.7%
Males
Tragic
12.1%
Tragic
13.2%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.8%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
22.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Poor
14.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
22.0%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
19.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
20.4%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
14.5%
Single Females
Poor
21.6%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
17.7%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.8%
Tragic
34.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
5.8%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
14.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
13.5%

Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PanamaIroquois
Unemployment
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
5.4%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Tragic
5.7%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.3%
Average
17.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Poor
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.1%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PanamaIroquois
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Average
65.1%
Tragic
63.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.0%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.9%
Excellent
75.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
81.9%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
80.6%

Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.9% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.32%), married-couple households (44.6% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PanamaIroquois
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Tragic
62.2%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Tragic
26.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.6%
Tragic
43.7%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.27
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Average
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Currently Married
Tragic
44.9%
Tragic
44.7%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
12.9%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.2%
Tragic
38.2%

Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 33.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 9.7%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PanamaIroquois
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.6%
Poor
10.9%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
85.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
51.1%
Fair
54.7%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.7%
Average
19.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.7%
Good
6.5%

Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 19.8%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and master's degree (14.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.4% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.33%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.43%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PanamaIroquois
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
97.8%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.3%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.3%
Average
91.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
89.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Tragic
84.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.4%
Tragic
62.6%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Tragic
56.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.7%
Tragic
42.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.2%
Tragic
33.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Panama and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 27.1%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Panama vs Iroquois Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PanamaIroquois
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Males
Poor
11.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.5%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
48.4%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
18.2%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.7%