Italian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,202,430 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 2.8 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $87,255, a difference of 26.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $83,682, a difference of 24.5%), and median household income ($92,475 compared to $74,279, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $47,380, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($41,505 compared to $36,408, a difference of 14.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 44.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 43.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 43.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.5% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.1%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single mother poverty (28.0% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.85%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.7%), births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.16, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (64.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 26.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.9%), master's degree (16.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 26.9%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 27.9%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 23.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 9.5%).