Hawaiian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 158,271,215 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 5.9 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $53,737, a difference of 20.8%), median household income ($84,729 compared to $74,279, a difference of 14.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,778 compared to $87,255, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,403 compared to $39,104, a difference of 0.77%), wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $49,374, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.4% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 26.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.9%), married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.1%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.10%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.5% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 15.0%), family households with children (28.7% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.1%), currently married (46.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 38.3%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 36.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 14.8%), master's degree (11.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 24.9%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.34%), disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.0%).