Immigrants from Peru vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,680,853 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Peru communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Peru within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Peru corresponds to an increase of 28.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($89,010 compared to $74,279, a difference of 19.8%), householder income under 25 years ($56,384 compared to $47,380, a difference of 19.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,173 compared to $87,255, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 0.15%), median female earnings ($39,871 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.5%), and median male earnings ($54,695 compared to $49,374, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 37.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 36.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.53%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 20.1%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 26.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.7%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.16, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.64%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 0.38%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 33.6%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and master's degree (14.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (84.2% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Peru and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 46.5%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 37.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.7%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 11.1%).