Alsatian vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,956,881 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.869. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.906% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 905.5 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $39,104, a difference of 20.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $87,255, a difference of 15.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,797 compared to $53,737, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $47,380, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $36,408, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 18.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.46%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 52.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 24.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.26%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.16, a difference of 0.57%), family households (61.7% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.93%), and currently married (45.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 34.4%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.4%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 11.4%).