Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Iroquois Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 114,135,693 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Iroquois within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Iroquois. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Iroquois.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 19.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $47,380, a difference of 15.5%), and median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $36,408, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $53,737, a difference of 3.1%), median family income ($94,665 compared to $90,543, a difference of 4.5%), and median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $49,374, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 36.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (19.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.54%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.9% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 32.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 75.6%, a difference of 7.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.53%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.7%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 38.2%, a difference of 23.7%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.3%), married-couple households (43.1% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 135.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 65.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 20.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 41.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 55.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 67.1%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.3%), and master's degree (15.5% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (56.6% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 0.59%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Iroquois communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.5%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 52.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 40.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.84%), cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.2%).