Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Renter-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Austin
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin

5.9%
88.1%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX

Zip Code % Renter-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 78705 88.1% 37.6% (+50.5)#44 35.2% (+52.9)#509
2. 78741 81.5% 37.6% (+43.9)#56 35.2% (+46.3)#634
3. 78752 79.1% 37.6% (+41.5)#63 35.2% (+43.9)#700
4. 78751 78.0% 37.6% (+40.4)#65 35.2% (+42.8)#739
5. 78758 73.5% 37.6% (+35.9)#79 35.2% (+38.4)#887
6. 78728 72.2% 37.6% (+34.6)#82 35.2% (+37.0)#946
7. 78704 68.2% 37.6% (+30.6)#99 35.2% (+33.0)#1,162
8. 78753 66.4% 37.6% (+28.8)#111 35.2% (+31.2)#1,276
9. 78702 57.9% 37.6% (+20.3)#171 35.2% (+22.7)#2,012
10. 78729 57.7% 37.6% (+20.1)#172 35.2% (+22.6)#2,025
11. 78726 55.8% 37.6% (+18.2)#183 35.2% (+20.6)#2,235
12. 78756 55.8% 37.6% (+18.2)#184 35.2% (+20.6)#2,237
13. 78727 55.5% 37.6% (+17.9)#186 35.2% (+20.4)#2,257
14. 78735 53.7% 37.6% (+16.1)#201 35.2% (+18.5)#2,517
15. 78759 52.5% 37.6% (+14.9)#216 35.2% (+17.3)#2,704
16. 78745 52.0% 37.6% (+14.4)#223 35.2% (+16.8)#2,766
17. 78722 51.5% 37.6% (+13.9)#227 35.2% (+16.3)#2,844
18. 78723 51.4% 37.6% (+13.8)#229 35.2% (+16.2)#2,865
19. 78701 50.6% 37.6% (+13.0)#242 35.2% (+15.4)#2,996
20. 78703 49.9% 37.6% (+12.3)#252 35.2% (+14.7)#3,115
21. 78721 49.8% 37.6% (+12.2)#255 35.2% (+14.6)#3,131
22. 78744 49.2% 37.6% (+11.6)#260 35.2% (+14.1)#3,221
23. 78731 45.2% 37.6% (+7.58)#337 35.2% (+10.00)#4,013
24. 78748 44.4% 37.6% (+6.76)#352 35.2% (+9.18)#4,233
25. 78717 43.7% 37.6% (+6.15)#363 35.2% (+8.57)#4,386
26. 78757 41.0% 37.6% (+3.38)#431 35.2% (+5.80)#5,112
27. 78754 38.8% 37.6% (+1.15)#483 35.2% (+3.57)#5,808
28. 78749 37.0% 37.6% (-0.557)#527 35.2% (+1.86)#6,462
29. 78750 36.9% 37.6% (-0.671)#530 35.2% (+1.75)#6,520
30. 78730 35.1% 37.6% (-2.46)#573 35.2% (-0.043)#7,279
31. 78724 33.7% 37.6% (-3.92)#629 35.2% (-1.50)#7,988
32. 78746 33.2% 37.6% (-4.39)#648 35.2% (-1.97)#8,212
33. 78742 31.5% 37.6% (-6.12)#704 35.2% (-3.70)#9,160
34. 78736 29.5% 37.6% (-8.07)#791 35.2% (-5.65)#10,372
35. 78732 28.6% 37.6% (-9.00)#825 35.2% (-6.58)#10,952
36. 78747 27.3% 37.6% (-10.3)#880 35.2% (-7.92)#11,918
37. 78738 23.2% 37.6% (-14.4)#1,077 35.2% (-12.0)#15,230
38. 78734 18.0% 37.6% (-19.6)#1,331 35.2% (-17.2)#20,203
39. 78725 14.8% 37.6% (-22.8)#1,489 35.2% (-20.4)#23,288
40. 78737 11.3% 37.6% (-26.3)#1,616 35.2% (-23.9)#26,369
41. 78733 10.8% 37.6% (-26.8)#1,631 35.2% (-24.4)#26,740
42. 78739 9.0% 37.6% (-28.6)#1,681 35.2% (-26.2)#27,987
43. 78719 5.9% 37.6% (-31.7)#1,759 35.2% (-29.3)#29,736

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX are:
#1
88.1%
#2
81.5%
#3
79.1%
#4
78.0%
#5
73.5%
#6
72.2%
#7
68.2%
#8
66.4%
#9
57.9%
#10
57.7%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX?
78705 has the Highest Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX with 88.1%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin, TX?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Austin is 55.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in Texas is 37.6%.
What is the Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Renter-Occupied Units in the United States is 35.2%.