Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama

60.0%
0.0%
Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama Map

Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama

City % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. Fort Rucker 0.82% 69.7% (-68.9)#1 64.8% (-64.0)#18
2. Redstone Arsenal 3.5% 69.7% (-66.2)#2 64.8% (-61.3)#48
3. Dozier 19.9% 69.7% (-49.9)#3 64.8% (-44.9)#208
4. Gainesville 26.5% 69.7% (-43.2)#4 64.8% (-38.3)#352
5. Mcmullen 29.4% 69.7% (-40.3)#5 64.8% (-35.4)#453
6. Livingston 32.4% 69.7% (-37.3)#6 64.8% (-32.4)#582
7. Union Springs 34.1% 69.7% (-35.7)#7 64.8% (-30.8)#669
8. Midland City 34.8% 69.7% (-35.0)#8 64.8% (-30.1)#698
9. Gantt 35.7% 69.7% (-34.1)#9 64.8% (-29.2)#769
10. Tarrant 37.7% 69.7% (-32.0)#10 64.8% (-27.1)#934
11. Boligee 40.4% 69.7% (-29.3)#11 64.8% (-24.4)#1,184
12. Brook Highland 42.1% 69.7% (-27.6)#12 64.8% (-22.7)#1,369
13. Emelle 42.9% 69.7% (-26.9)#13 64.8% (-22.0)#1,482
14. Peterman 42.9% 69.7% (-26.9)#14 64.8% (-22.0)#1,485
15. Mcdonald Chapel 42.9% 69.7% (-26.8)#15 64.8% (-21.9)#1,490
16. Aliceville 43.1% 69.7% (-26.7)#16 64.8% (-21.8)#1,498
17. Heath 44.2% 69.7% (-25.6)#17 64.8% (-20.7)#1,654
18. Orrville 45.0% 69.7% (-24.7)#18 64.8% (-19.8)#1,802
19. Hatton 45.7% 69.7% (-24.1)#19 64.8% (-19.2)#1,897
20. Tuscaloosa 45.7% 69.7% (-24.1)#20 64.8% (-19.2)#1,902
21. Birmingham 45.9% 69.7% (-23.8)#21 64.8% (-18.9)#1,939
22. Tuskegee 46.2% 69.7% (-23.5)#22 64.8% (-18.6)#1,985
23. Selma 46.8% 69.7% (-23.0)#23 64.8% (-18.1)#2,094
24. Vernon 47.0% 69.7% (-22.7)#24 64.8% (-17.8)#2,145
25. Chickasaw 47.7% 69.7% (-22.1)#25 64.8% (-17.1)#2,289
26. Clayton 47.8% 69.7% (-21.9)#26 64.8% (-17.0)#2,323
27. Greensboro 48.1% 69.7% (-21.6)#27 64.8% (-16.7)#2,374
28. Troy 48.7% 69.7% (-21.0)#28 64.8% (-16.1)#2,520
29. Florence 49.9% 69.7% (-19.8)#29 64.8% (-14.9)#2,821
30. Greenville 50.3% 69.7% (-19.5)#30 64.8% (-14.6)#2,954
31. Hanceville 50.4% 69.7% (-19.4)#31 64.8% (-14.5)#2,981
32. Mobile 50.6% 69.7% (-19.1)#32 64.8% (-14.2)#3,052
33. Florala 50.8% 69.7% (-18.9)#33 64.8% (-14.0)#3,093
34. Fayette 50.8% 69.7% (-18.9)#34 64.8% (-14.0)#3,100
35. Thomasville 50.9% 69.7% (-18.8)#35 64.8% (-13.9)#3,119
36. Auburn 51.3% 69.7% (-18.4)#36 64.8% (-13.5)#3,246
37. Ashland 51.5% 69.7% (-18.2)#37 64.8% (-13.3)#3,291
38. Clio 51.6% 69.7% (-18.1)#38 64.8% (-13.2)#3,312
39. Phenix City 51.8% 69.7% (-17.9)#39 64.8% (-13.0)#3,377
40. Evergreen 51.8% 69.7% (-17.9)#40 64.8% (-13.0)#3,392
41. Loachapoka 52.0% 69.7% (-17.7)#41 64.8% (-12.8)#3,457
42. Reform 52.0% 69.7% (-17.7)#42 64.8% (-12.8)#3,459
43. Marion 52.4% 69.7% (-17.3)#43 64.8% (-12.4)#3,592
44. Louisville 52.6% 69.7% (-17.1)#44 64.8% (-12.2)#3,635
45. Jacksonville 52.7% 69.7% (-17.0)#45 64.8% (-12.1)#3,681
46. Tallassee 53.0% 69.7% (-16.7)#46 64.8% (-11.8)#3,799
47. Faunsdale 53.1% 69.7% (-16.6)#47 64.8% (-11.7)#3,833
48. Daleville 53.1% 69.7% (-16.6)#48 64.8% (-11.7)#3,839
49. Gordon 53.2% 69.7% (-16.6)#49 64.8% (-11.7)#3,847
50. Elmore 53.3% 69.7% (-16.4)#50 64.8% (-11.5)#3,882
51. Demopolis 53.5% 69.7% (-16.2)#51 64.8% (-11.3)#3,946
52. Montgomery 53.5% 69.7% (-16.2)#52 64.8% (-11.3)#3,949
53. Wadley 53.6% 69.7% (-16.1)#53 64.8% (-11.2)#3,979
54. Bayou La Batre 53.9% 69.7% (-15.8)#54 64.8% (-10.9)#4,059
55. Atmore 53.9% 69.7% (-15.8)#55 64.8% (-10.9)#4,087
56. Sylacauga 54.0% 69.7% (-15.7)#56 64.8% (-10.8)#4,118
57. Talladega 54.1% 69.7% (-15.6)#57 64.8% (-10.7)#4,152
58. Bessemer 54.3% 69.7% (-15.4)#58 64.8% (-10.5)#4,214
59. Lockhart 54.4% 69.7% (-15.3)#59 64.8% (-10.4)#4,248
60. Flomaton 54.5% 69.7% (-15.2)#60 64.8% (-10.3)#4,270
61. Detroit 54.5% 69.7% (-15.2)#61 64.8% (-10.3)#4,283
62. Hayneville 54.6% 69.7% (-15.1)#62 64.8% (-10.2)#4,323
63. Haleyville 54.9% 69.7% (-14.8)#63 64.8% (-9.88)#4,433
64. Standing Rock 55.0% 69.7% (-14.7)#64 64.8% (-9.82)#4,464
65. Oneonta 55.1% 69.7% (-14.7)#65 64.8% (-9.76)#4,474
66. Monroeville 55.4% 69.7% (-14.3)#66 64.8% (-9.44)#4,593
67. Goodwater 55.5% 69.7% (-14.2)#67 64.8% (-9.31)#4,631
68. Gadsden 55.5% 69.7% (-14.2)#68 64.8% (-9.27)#4,640
69. Prichard 56.1% 69.7% (-13.7)#69 64.8% (-8.76)#4,842
70. East Brewton 56.1% 69.7% (-13.6)#70 64.8% (-8.72)#4,860
71. Fairfield 56.3% 69.7% (-13.4)#71 64.8% (-8.51)#4,947
72. Gaylesville 56.4% 69.7% (-13.4)#72 64.8% (-8.45)#4,975
73. Blountsville 56.4% 69.7% (-13.3)#73 64.8% (-8.38)#5,011
74. Uniontown 56.5% 69.7% (-13.2)#74 64.8% (-8.31)#5,041
75. Tuscumbia 56.8% 69.7% (-13.0)#75 64.8% (-8.06)#5,132
76. Collinsville 56.9% 69.7% (-12.8)#76 64.8% (-7.94)#5,173
77. Linden 57.1% 69.7% (-12.6)#77 64.8% (-7.69)#5,269
78. Double Springs 57.3% 69.7% (-12.5)#78 64.8% (-7.56)#5,342
79. Huntsville 57.5% 69.7% (-12.2)#79 64.8% (-7.32)#5,434
80. Eufaula 57.6% 69.7% (-12.2)#80 64.8% (-7.26)#5,461
81. Ardmore 57.6% 69.7% (-12.1)#81 64.8% (-7.21)#5,484
82. South Vinemont 57.8% 69.7% (-12.0)#82 64.8% (-7.06)#5,552
83. Enterprise 57.9% 69.7% (-11.8)#83 64.8% (-6.92)#5,619
84. Samson 58.1% 69.7% (-11.6)#84 64.8% (-6.71)#5,697
85. Brantley 58.1% 69.7% (-11.6)#85 64.8% (-6.69)#5,709
86. Sheffield 58.2% 69.7% (-11.5)#86 64.8% (-6.61)#5,737
87. Clanton 58.2% 69.7% (-11.5)#87 64.8% (-6.61)#5,738
88. Hamilton 58.3% 69.7% (-11.4)#88 64.8% (-6.54)#5,773
89. Midway 58.5% 69.7% (-11.2)#89 64.8% (-6.27)#5,879
90. Dora 58.6% 69.7% (-11.1)#90 64.8% (-6.24)#5,899
91. Dothan 58.7% 69.7% (-11.0)#91 64.8% (-6.08)#5,975
92. York 58.9% 69.7% (-10.9)#92 64.8% (-5.96)#6,022
93. Carrollton 59.0% 69.7% (-10.8)#93 64.8% (-5.86)#6,060
94. Midfield 59.0% 69.7% (-10.7)#94 64.8% (-5.81)#6,085
95. Center Point 59.0% 69.7% (-10.7)#95 64.8% (-5.79)#6,091
96. Holly Pond 59.1% 69.7% (-10.6)#96 64.8% (-5.69)#6,136
97. Moulton 59.2% 69.7% (-10.6)#97 64.8% (-5.66)#6,148
98. Luverne 59.5% 69.7% (-10.2)#98 64.8% (-5.34)#6,302
99. Ladonia 59.8% 69.7% (-9.96)#99 64.8% (-5.06)#6,440
100. Lexington 59.8% 69.7% (-9.92)#100 64.8% (-5.01)#6,461

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama are:
#1
0.82%
#2
3.5%
#3
19.9%
#4
26.5%
#5
29.4%
#6
32.4%
#7
34.1%
#8
34.8%
#9
35.7%
#10
37.7%
What city has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama?
Fort Rucker has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama with 0.82%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Alabama is 69.7%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.