Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Lowest Owner-Occupied
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa

100.0%
0.85%
Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code % Owner-Occupied vs State vs National
1. 74103 0.85% 65.9% (-65.1)#1 64.8% (-64.0)#27
2. 74119 24.9% 65.9% (-41.1)#7 64.8% (-39.9)#533
3. 74120 33.9% 65.9% (-32.1)#10 64.8% (-30.9)#997
4. 74146 34.7% 65.9% (-31.2)#12 64.8% (-30.1)#1,065
5. 74136 36.8% 65.9% (-29.1)#15 64.8% (-28.0)#1,240
6. 74116 44.7% 65.9% (-21.2)#28 64.8% (-20.1)#1,999
7. 74106 47.0% 65.9% (-18.9)#33 64.8% (-17.8)#2,321
8. 74104 47.4% 65.9% (-18.6)#34 64.8% (-17.5)#2,377
9. 74129 49.8% 65.9% (-16.2)#40 64.8% (-15.0)#2,746
10. 74133 51.4% 65.9% (-14.6)#42 64.8% (-13.4)#3,042
11. 74110 51.4% 65.9% (-14.6)#43 64.8% (-13.4)#3,047
12. 74135 51.9% 65.9% (-14.1)#46 64.8% (-12.9)#3,121
13. 74107 52.8% 65.9% (-13.2)#50 64.8% (-12.1)#3,301
14. 74105 54.3% 65.9% (-11.7)#54 64.8% (-10.6)#3,601
15. 74115 54.8% 65.9% (-11.1)#56 64.8% (-9.97)#3,724
16. 74112 55.9% 65.9% (-10.0)#63 64.8% (-8.88)#4,005
17. 74132 56.0% 65.9% (-9.90)#64 64.8% (-8.78)#4,036
18. 74145 57.6% 65.9% (-8.39)#72 64.8% (-7.26)#4,426
19. 74127 58.0% 65.9% (-7.99)#76 64.8% (-6.87)#4,529
20. 74128 59.7% 65.9% (-6.22)#85 64.8% (-5.09)#5,028
21. 74126 60.9% 65.9% (-5.04)#91 64.8% (-3.92)#5,392
22. 74134 65.3% 65.9% (-0.631)#123 64.8% (+0.493)#7,211
23. 74137 67.8% 65.9% (+1.83)#152 64.8% (+2.96)#8,418
24. 74108 67.8% 65.9% (+1.83)#153 64.8% (+2.96)#8,419
25. 74130 69.7% 65.9% (+3.79)#173 64.8% (+4.91)#9,590
26. 74114 77.9% 65.9% (+12.0)#350 64.8% (+13.1)#15,980
27. 74131 79.1% 65.9% (+13.1)#371 64.8% (+14.3)#17,060
28. 74117 100.0% 65.9% (+34.1)#648 64.8% (+35.2)#32,293

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
0.85%
#2
24.9%
#3
33.9%
#4
34.7%
#5
36.8%
#6
44.7%
#7
47.0%
#8
47.4%
#9
49.8%
#10
51.4%
What zip code has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
74103 has the Lowest Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK with 0.85%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa, OK?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Tulsa is 52.3%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in Oklahoma is 65.9%.
What is the Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States?
Percentage of Owner-Occupied Units in the United States is 64.8%.