Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Girls 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

9.8%
59.0%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty (Girls) vs State vs National
1. 74130 59.0% 20.8% (+38.1)#26 17.0% (+42.0)#1,341
2. 74106 53.3% 20.8% (+32.5)#40 17.0% (+36.3)#1,748
3. 74126 47.2% 20.8% (+26.4)#52 17.0% (+30.3)#2,356
4. 74110 41.2% 20.8% (+20.3)#74 17.0% (+24.2)#3,155
5. 74131 40.5% 20.8% (+19.7)#83 17.0% (+23.6)#3,272
6. 74116 40.3% 20.8% (+19.5)#87 17.0% (+23.4)#3,311
7. 74107 40.3% 20.8% (+19.5)#88 17.0% (+23.3)#3,314
8. 74115 38.2% 20.8% (+17.3)#101 17.0% (+21.2)#3,698
9. 74108 37.2% 20.8% (+16.4)#107 17.0% (+20.3)#3,891
10. 74127 36.2% 20.8% (+15.4)#115 17.0% (+19.2)#4,110
11. 74146 35.9% 20.8% (+15.1)#120 17.0% (+18.9)#4,172
12. 74129 35.9% 20.8% (+15.0)#123 17.0% (+18.9)#4,188
13. 74128 32.1% 20.8% (+11.3)#161 17.0% (+15.1)#5,139
14. 74104 31.7% 20.8% (+10.8)#168 17.0% (+14.7)#5,269
15. 74112 28.4% 20.8% (+7.54)#200 17.0% (+11.4)#6,265
16. 74136 27.4% 20.8% (+6.55)#211 17.0% (+10.4)#6,612
17. 74105 23.1% 20.8% (+2.27)#270 17.0% (+6.13)#8,314
18. 74145 20.0% 20.8% (-0.803)#322 17.0% (+3.06)#9,825
19. 74134 15.0% 20.8% (-5.84)#399 17.0% (-1.98)#12,768
20. 74135 14.8% 20.8% (-6.02)#406 17.0% (-2.16)#12,885
21. 74120 12.8% 20.8% (-8.00)#439 17.0% (-4.14)#14,219
22. 74114 12.7% 20.8% (-8.18)#442 17.0% (-4.32)#14,348
23. 74133 10.6% 20.8% (-10.2)#466 17.0% (-6.36)#15,791
24. 74137 10.5% 20.8% (-10.3)#467 17.0% (-6.43)#15,845
25. 74132 9.8% 20.8% (-11.1)#479 17.0% (-7.20)#16,416

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
59.0%
#2
53.3%
#3
47.2%
#4
41.2%
#5
40.5%
#6
40.3%
#7
40.3%
#8
38.2%
#9
37.2%
#10
36.2%
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74130 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 59.0%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.9%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.8%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Girls Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 17.0%.