Immigrants from Latvia vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 111,185,401 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.204% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 203.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $33,279, a difference of 53.0%), median family income ($114,826 compared to $80,908, a difference of 41.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $79,816, a difference of 39.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $47,704, a difference of 8.5%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $52,081, a difference of 23.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 81.6%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 81.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 24.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 29.3%), and single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 32.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 69.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 63.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 65.9%), births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 47.7%), and single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.0% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 5.9%), family households (62.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 7.1%), and currently married (46.7% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 49.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 30.8%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 9.0%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 97.6%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 91.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 56.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 51.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%).