Alsatian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,984,276 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.232. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.042% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 42.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $33,279, a difference of 42.1%), median family income ($103,010 compared to $80,908, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $79,816, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 0.40%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $47,704, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $33,806, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 57.1%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 51.2%), and family poverty (9.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 48.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 4.2%), single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 6.8%), and single female poverty (24.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 66.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 61.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 49.4%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.8% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.1%), currently married (45.7% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 6.8%), and family households (61.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 26.6%), and no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 76.2%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 70.0%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 62.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 61.6%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.9%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 12.1%).