Immigrants from Eastern Asia vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,483,075 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.459. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.032% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Asia corresponds to an increase of 31.7 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,806 compared to $33,279, a difference of 61.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($118,056 compared to $75,647, a difference of 56.1%), and median family income ($125,150 compared to $80,908, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 10.2%), householder income under 25 years ($57,123 compared to $47,704, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($69,872 compared to $52,081, a difference of 34.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.5% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 89.0%), receiving food stamps (9.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 85.4%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 84.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 28.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 82.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 65.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 60.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 71.7%), single father households (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 69.8%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 57.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.2%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.6%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.45, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 31.8%), no vehicles in household (13.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 123.8%), professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 122.2%), and master's degree (20.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 109.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.050%), 6th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and 5th grade (97.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 90.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 74.3%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.7%).