Czech vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 445,513,951 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.030% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 30.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $33,279, a difference of 34.0%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $80,908, a difference of 30.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $79,816, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $47,704, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $33,806, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $52,081, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 103.6%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 92.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 87.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 24.5%), single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 26.8%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 75.0%), male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 70.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 64.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 40.8%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 52.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.5%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 48.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.2%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 13.3%).