Indian (Asian) vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 458,459,664 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 2.3 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,874 compared to $33,279, a difference of 61.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $75,647, a difference of 58.0%), and median household income ($105,262 compared to $67,879, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $47,704, a difference of 22.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $52,081, a difference of 34.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 90.0%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 85.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 81.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 21.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 83.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 63.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.76%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 70.1%), single father households (1.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 68.2%), and single mother households (5.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 34.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 27.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 120.7%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 119.8%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 105.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.060%), 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 93.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 72.9%), and vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 60.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 14.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 19.9%).