Immigrants from Asia vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 496,702,338 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.465. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Asia corresponds to a decrease of 6.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,741 compared to $33,279, a difference of 49.5%), median household income ($99,933 compared to $67,879, a difference of 47.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,787 compared to $75,647, a difference of 46.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($56,379 compared to $47,704, a difference of 18.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,594 compared to $52,081, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 79.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 77.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 75.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 26.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 37.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 70.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 63.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 60.5%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 53.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.45%), family households with children (28.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.45, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.63%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.3% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (10.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 86.3%), master's degree (18.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 85.4%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 83.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 7th grade (95.5% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.090%), and 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Asia and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 82.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 61.5%), and vision disability (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 18.6%).