Mexican vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 507,288,940 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Mexican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.125. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexicans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexicans corresponds to an increase of 2.0 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,399 compared to $67,879, a difference of 9.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,816 compared to $79,816, a difference of 8.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,427 compared to $75,647, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,664 compared to $33,806, a difference of 0.42%), median earnings ($39,834 compared to $38,896, a difference of 2.4%), and median male earnings ($46,147 compared to $44,775, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 40.3%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 38.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and single mother poverty (33.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.4%), and male unemployment (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.2% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 16.4%), family households with children (31.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and married-couple households (47.1% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.72%), average family size (3.48 compared to 3.45, a difference of 0.77%), and family households (69.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 49.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.0% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 46.8%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 13.1%), and professional degree (2.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (35.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 0.24%), nursery school (96.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 52.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 31.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (51.1% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 4.8%).