Chippewa vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,344,515 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Chippewa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.966. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chippewa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.976% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chippewa corresponds to an increase of 976.0 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($36,631 compared to $33,279, a difference of 10.1%), median family income ($86,852 compared to $80,908, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,005 compared to $75,647, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,015 compared to $47,704, a difference of 1.5%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,847 compared to $52,081, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.6%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and single male poverty (16.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.9% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 2.0%), single female poverty (26.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother poverty (34.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.6%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.8%), and male unemployment (6.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (7.0% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.1% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in average family size (3.20 compared to 3.45, a difference of 7.8%), family households (62.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households with children (26.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.56%), births to unmarried women (42.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 0.83%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 0.40%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.94%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.3%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.3%), and associate's degree (40.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chippewa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.050%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.33%), and male disability (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.53%).