Immigrants from Laos vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 197,384,375 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Laos communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Laos within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Laos corresponds to an increase of 152.4 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($78,327 compared to $67,879, a difference of 15.4%), median family income ($92,239 compared to $80,908, a difference of 14.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,909 compared to $79,816, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 3.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,041 compared to $47,704, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,722 compared to $52,081, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 50.9%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 48.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 19.8%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 23.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 23.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 53.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 26.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and currently married (45.0% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.6%), average family size (3.34 compared to 3.45, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (45.1% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 28.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 6.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.2%), bachelor's degree (31.6% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 20.1%), and associate's degree (40.7% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.35%), 10th grade (91.9% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.36%), and 9th grade (93.2% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.77%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Laos and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 54.8%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.43%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 7.8%).