Uruguayan vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,062,185 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Uruguayan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.483. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Uruguayans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.221% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Uruguayans corresponds to an increase of 220.7 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,318 compared to $33,279, a difference of 33.2%), median household income ($84,691 compared to $67,879, a difference of 24.8%), and median family income ($100,656 compared to $80,908, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 2.4%), householder income under 25 years ($52,465 compared to $47,704, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($59,090 compared to $52,081, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 64.3%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 56.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.5% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.7%), and single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 29.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 59.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 53.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 53.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 35.0%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 29.8%), and single mother households (6.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (64.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (45.5% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 27.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 56.7%), master's degree (15.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 53.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.1% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.10%), 7th grade (95.4% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Uruguayan and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 59.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 51.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 49.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.7%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 14.7%).