Native Hawaiian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 321,142,715 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 11.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $52,081, a difference of 36.4%), median household income ($89,919 compared to $67,879, a difference of 32.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,149 compared to $79,816, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($38,461 compared to $33,806, a difference of 13.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $47,704, a difference of 15.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 76.9%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 71.5%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 28.8%), receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 34.7%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 41.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 44.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 41.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.43 compared to 3.45, a difference of 0.62%), family households (68.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 36.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 7.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 41.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 28.7%), and bachelor's degree (33.2% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 44.3%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.6%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.9%).