Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,895,201 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to an increase of 9.1 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,709 compared to $33,279, a difference of 25.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $75,647, a difference of 19.6%), and median household income ($80,722 compared to $67,879, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $52,081, a difference of 6.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,714 compared to $47,704, a difference of 14.7%), and median male earnings ($51,642 compared to $44,775, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 50.6%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 37.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and receiving food stamps (15.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 36.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 21.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.8%), births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 39.2%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.1% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 0.81%), currently married (43.6% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.45, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 145.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 110.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 20.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 81.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 55.8%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.4%), and bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 43.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.5% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.12%), 12th grade, no diploma (88.0% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and 11th grade (89.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.76%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 127.8%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 73.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 10.4%).