Norwegian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 483,027,840 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 17.8 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,480 compared to $33,279, a difference of 33.7%), median family income ($106,144 compared to $80,908, a difference of 31.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $79,816, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $47,704, a difference of 11.4%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $33,806, a difference of 14.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $52,081, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 120.4%), family poverty (6.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 107.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 29.0%), and single female poverty (20.8% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 35.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 81.6%), male unemployment (4.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 74.1%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 67.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 23.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 26.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 46.8%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 46.5%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 63.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 66.6%), bachelor's degree (37.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 42.3%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 35.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.7%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 10.8%).