Chilean vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 249,013,304 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 13.9 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $33,279, a difference of 39.6%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $80,908, a difference of 34.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $79,816, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,704, a difference of 11.5%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $33,806, a difference of 20.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 68.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 65.7%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 64.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 22.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.5%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 31.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 65.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 60.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 44.7%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 40.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.96%), family households (65.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.45, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 28.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 15.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.39%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 77.9%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 70.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 62.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 51.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 49.5%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 17.1%).