Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,048,265 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.152. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 8.0 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $33,279, a difference of 48.2%), median family income ($112,527 compared to $80,908, a difference of 39.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $75,647, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $47,704, a difference of 16.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $52,081, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 76.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 69.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 68.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 23.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 30.9%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 34.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 63.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 57.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 61.0%), births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 55.9%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.7%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 5.7%), and average family size (3.17 compared to 3.45, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 50.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 30.7%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 77.3%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 77.0%), and bachelor's degree (42.5% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 61.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.020%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 63.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.2%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 14.5%).