White/Caucasian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,755,303 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.482. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 35.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($42,180 compared to $33,279, a difference of 26.8%), median family income ($99,800 compared to $80,908, a difference of 23.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $79,816, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $47,704, a difference of 5.5%), median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $33,806, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,847 compared to $52,081, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 69.8%), family poverty (8.8% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 62.6%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.5%), single father poverty (18.4% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 22.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 56.4%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 53.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.1%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 31.3%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.0%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 49.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 0.73%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (13.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 39.1%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 37.8%), and no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.48%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 25.4%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and female disability (13.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 7.3%).