Immigrants from Ecuador vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 260,627,327 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 6.5 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,195 compared to $33,279, a difference of 23.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $75,647, a difference of 18.5%), and median household income ($80,341 compared to $67,879, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $52,081, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 9.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $47,704, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 56.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 38.7%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 14.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 46.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 17.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 0.22%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.9%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 27.4%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (43.2% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 0.94%), married-couple households (42.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (64.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 127.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 93.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 17.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 40.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 69.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.4%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 36.8%), and bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (81.0% compared to 80.9%, a difference of 0.070%), 12th grade, no diploma (87.5% compared to 87.7%, a difference of 0.21%), and high school diploma (84.8% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 69.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.4%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 11.9%).