Immigrants from Eastern Africa vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,344,390 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Immigrant from Eastern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.151. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.090% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Africa corresponds to an increase of 89.9 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,838 compared to $33,279, a difference of 31.7%), median family income ($102,451 compared to $80,908, a difference of 26.6%), and median household income ($84,299 compared to $67,879, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,158 compared to $47,704, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,157 compared to $52,081, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 59.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 56.9%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.4% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 18.6%), single mother poverty (29.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 24.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 62.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.5% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (81.3% compared to 73.9%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 38.8%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 32.3%), and single mother households (6.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (42.9% compared to 43.5%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (44.2% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.7% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (16.3% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 64.6%), professional degree (4.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 62.7%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (95.3% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (96.6% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Africa and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 62.5%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 50.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 53.1%, a difference of 12.5%).