Trinidadian and Tobagonian vs Native/Alaskan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 211,948,954 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans within Trinidadian and Tobagonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.797. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Trinidadians and Tobagonians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Natives/Alaskans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Trinidadians and Tobagonians corresponds to an increase of 166.2 Natives/Alaskans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 27.1%), per capita income ($41,655 compared to $33,279, a difference of 25.2%), and median female earnings ($40,958 compared to $33,806, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,327 compared to $52,081, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,631 compared to $47,704, a difference of 10.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,357 compared to $79,816, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 50.7%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 42.8%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.36%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and receiving food stamps (16.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 43.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 30.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 0.89%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 18.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 60.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.5% compared to 78.9%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.5% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 47.4%), births to unmarried women (36.5% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 17.9%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (41.5% compared to 42.8%, a difference of 3.0%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.45, a difference of 3.8%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 126.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 92.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 17.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.9% compared to 57.0%, a difference of 39.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 67.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.4% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 44.6%), bachelor's degree (35.7% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 35.5%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.23%), 10th grade (92.4% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.25%), and 8th grade (94.7% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.43%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Trinidadian and Tobagonian and Native/Alaskan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 73.3%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 68.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 9.7%).