Dutch vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,293,472 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Dutch communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Dutch within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Dutch corresponds to a decrease of 1.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Dutch and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,971 compared to $94,990, a difference of 14.5%), median female earnings ($37,339 compared to $42,133, a difference of 12.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,081 compared to $104,993, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,265 compared to $54,369, a difference of 6.1%), median male earnings ($54,410 compared to $59,351, a difference of 9.1%), and per capita income ($42,605 compared to $47,041, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Dutch and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 18.7%), single father poverty (17.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 18.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and poverty (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Dutch and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.60%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Dutch and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.8% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 25.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Dutch and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.8%), births to unmarried women (31.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.50%), family households (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (49.5% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.6% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Dutch and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 56.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.1%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Dutch and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.2%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 29.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.1%).