Alsatian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 65,091,639 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.997. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.148% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 1,147.7 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($85,053 compared to $94,990, a difference of 11.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $111,051, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $104,993, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($47,284 compared to $47,041, a difference of 0.52%), median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $42,133, a difference of 5.2%), and wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 33.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 30.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.3%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.94%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.27%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 18.8%), family households with children (25.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 12.6%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.7% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 3.7%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.8%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 45.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 36.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 7.4%), and college, 1 year or more (61.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.080%), and high school diploma (89.4% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%).