Immigrants from China vs Laotian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Laotian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Laotians
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
120th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Laotian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,181,421 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.295 and weighted average of 10.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,721,860 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.486 and weighted average of 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Laotian |
Minimum | 1.9% | 0.78% |
Maximum | 24.3% | 47.7% |
Range | 22.4% | 46.9% |
Mean | 10.4% | 11.0% |
Median | 9.8% | 9.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.4% | 11.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.4% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.7% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Laotians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.030%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Hungary (10.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Okinawan (10.7%, a difference of 0.11%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Portuguese (10.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |