Barbadian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,705,029 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.147. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to an increase of 49.9 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 39.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $111,051, a difference of 23.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $66,306, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $42,133, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $54,369, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $50,343, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 65.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 40.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 40.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.4%), single male poverty (13.4% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 13.4%), and single female poverty (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 31.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 30.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.6%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 29.8%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (62.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 187.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 89.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 23.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 52.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 71.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.7%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 0.32%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.0%).