Finnish vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,159,854 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.745. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 14.0 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($83,607 compared to $94,990, a difference of 13.6%), householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $66,306, a difference of 11.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,904 compared to $111,051, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $54,369, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($43,461 compared to $47,041, a difference of 8.2%), and wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 14.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 13.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.82%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and poverty (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 21.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.92%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 26.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.3%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.51%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (48.8% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.7%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.1%).