Guamanian/Chamorro vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 148,089,187 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Guamanian/Chamorro communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.017. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guamanians/Chamorros within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guamanians/Chamorros corresponds to a decrease of 2.2 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,678 compared to $47,041, a difference of 12.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,569 compared to $104,993, a difference of 12.2%), and median family income ($101,061 compared to $112,859, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,423 compared to $54,369, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,187 compared to $66,306, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.1%), single female poverty (21.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.1% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 0.15%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.2% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.1%), and births to unmarried women (31.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.67%), currently married (47.1% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 0.73%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 13.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.5% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.1%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 38.0%), and master's degree (13.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.090%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guamanian/Chamorro and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 21.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.0%), and male disability (12.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.47%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 3.2%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.8%).