Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Laotians
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,956,360 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to a decrease of 11.5 Laotians.
Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($72,193 compared to $112,859, a difference of 56.3%), per capita income ($30,256 compared to $47,041, a difference of 55.5%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $94,990, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 19.1%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $54,369, a difference of 20.2%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $42,133, a difference of 26.9%).
Income Metric | Tohono O'odham | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,256 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $72,193 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $61,663 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $36,349 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $39,543 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $33,205 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $45,248 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $69,068 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,774 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,121 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.1% | Poor 26.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 151.8%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 138.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (31.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 121.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 46.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 55.5%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 59.7%).
Poverty Metric | Tohono O'odham | Laotian |
Poverty | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Tragic 20.4% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Tragic 22.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 24.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 29.5% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 31.7% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 31.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 21.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 34.2% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 20.8% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 19.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 21.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 94.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 94.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 88.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Tohono O'odham | Laotian |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.9% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Tragic 10.2% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Tragic 7.7% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.8% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 22.1% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 12.1% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 8.4% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 9.3% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.0% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.1% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (70.4% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 8.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Tohono O'odham | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.2% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 70.4% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.3% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 68.6% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 77.5% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 77.7% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.1% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 75.1% | Good 82.9% |
Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 75.1%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 71.4%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (67.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Family Structure Metric | Tohono O'odham | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 67.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 37.9% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.53 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 9.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Tragic 36.8% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 49.8% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 72.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 14.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 84.7% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 50.0% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 18.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 6.6% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 84.3%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 75.4%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 71.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.070%).
Education Level Metric | Tohono O'odham | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Fair 97.9% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Fair 97.9% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Fair 97.8% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Fair 97.8% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 92.6% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.1% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Tragic 87.6% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.7% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 77.5% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 52.8% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 47.1% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 31.8% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 24.4% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.7% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Tohono O'odham vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 78.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (16.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 65.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and disability age over 75 (56.7% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 18.4%).
Disability Metric | Tohono O'odham | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 2.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.7% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 36.0% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 56.7% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Tragic 19.3% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 3.1% | Excellent 2.4% |