Apache vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,089,362 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.495. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.223% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 223.1 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $111,051, a difference of 35.1%), per capita income ($34,886 compared to $47,041, a difference of 34.8%), and median household income ($70,927 compared to $94,990, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.4%), householder income under 25 years ($49,395 compared to $54,369, a difference of 10.1%), and median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $42,133, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 90.0%), receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 83.4%), and family poverty (14.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 82.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 24.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 35.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 88.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 83.8%), and male unemployment (8.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 65.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 40.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 35.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.46 compared to 3.26, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 21.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.17%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 55.2%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.1%), and bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.14%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 65.9%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 49.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (14.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 7.8%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age over 75 (53.6% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 11.9%).