Mexican American Indian vs Laotian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,463,969 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.033% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to an increase of 32.7 Laotians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $47,041, a difference of 25.8%), median family income ($90,918 compared to $112,859, a difference of 24.1%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $59,351, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $54,369, a difference of 5.0%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $66,306, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 38.0%), married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (13.1% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 30.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 26.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.2%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.9%), family households with children (29.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and average family size (3.43 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 13.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 8.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.35%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.090%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 66.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 60.5%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.99%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.2% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.5%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.5%).