White/Caucasian vs Laotian Community Comparison
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Laotian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Laotians
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Laotian Integration in White/Caucasian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,486,053 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Laotians.
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,029 compared to $94,990, a difference of 15.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $104,993, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $111,051, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $54,369, a difference of 8.0%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $59,351, a difference of 10.1%).
Income Metric | White/Caucasian | Laotian |
Per Capita Income | Poor $42,180 | Exceptional $47,041 |
Median Family Income | Poor $99,800 | Exceptional $112,859 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,029 | Exceptional $94,990 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,197 | Exceptional $50,343 |
Median Male Earnings | Fair $53,925 | Exceptional $59,351 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,531 | Exceptional $42,133 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,336 | Exceptional $54,369 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,668 | Exceptional $104,993 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Fair $98,091 | Exceptional $111,051 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,847 | Exceptional $66,306 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 28.5% | Poor 26.4% |
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.9%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.1%), and single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
Poverty Metric | White/Caucasian | Laotian |
Poverty | Average 12.3% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Exceptional 10.5% |
Females | Average 13.4% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.8% | Exceptional 19.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 12.2% |
Children Under 5 years | Poor 18.1% | Exceptional 14.7% |
Children Under 16 years | Average 16.2% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.5% | Exceptional 14.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 14.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 19.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.4% | Exceptional 15.1% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.2% | Exceptional 27.0% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Good 10.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Fair 12.3% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
Unemployment Metric | White/Caucasian | Laotian |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.2% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.2% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Average 5.3% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Excellent 17.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Poor 6.9% | Excellent 6.5% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Good 4.6% | Excellent 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Good 4.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 8.2% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.4% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 7.9% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.93%).
Labor Participation Metric | White/Caucasian | Laotian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Exceptional 65.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.5% | Average 79.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 41.3% | Tragic 34.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Tragic 74.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.2% | Poor 84.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.9% | Average 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.6% | Poor 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 82.9% |
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 16.8%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (65.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
Family Structure Metric | White/Caucasian | Laotian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.1% | Exceptional 65.8% |
Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 28.5% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.6% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.14 | Excellent 3.26 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 48.6% | Excellent 47.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Exceptional 28.5% |
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | White/Caucasian | Laotian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 9.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.1% | Exceptional 91.0% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 60.8% | Exceptional 58.6% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 21.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.4% |
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.33%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
Education Level Metric | White/Caucasian | Laotian |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Poor 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Tragic 97.8% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 97.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Poor 97.1% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 96.8% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.0% | Tragic 95.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Tragic 95.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.8% | Fair 94.6% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Fair 93.6% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.3% | Average 92.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.8% | Good 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.1% | Good 89.3% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.2% | Excellent 86.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 64.0% | Exceptional 68.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Exceptional 62.8% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 44.2% | Exceptional 49.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.3% | Exceptional 42.0% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Professional Degree | Poor 4.1% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Doctorate Degree | Fair 1.8% | Exceptional 2.3% |
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
Disability Metric | White/Caucasian | Laotian |
Disability | Tragic 13.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Females | Tragic 13.2% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.7% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.6% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 10.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.2% | Exceptional 22.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.3% | Poor 47.9% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Excellent 2.9% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 17.0% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |