White/Caucasian vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

White/Caucasian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Whites/Caucasians

Laotians

Average
Good
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in White/Caucasian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,486,053 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Laotians within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to a decrease of 0.2 Laotians.
White/Caucasian Integration in Laotian Communities

White/Caucasian vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($82,029 compared to $94,990, a difference of 15.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $104,993, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($98,091 compared to $111,051, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $54,369, a difference of 8.0%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $59,351, a difference of 10.1%).
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Income
Income MetricWhite/CaucasianLaotian
Per Capita Income
Poor
$42,180
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Poor
$99,800
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Poor
$82,029
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,197
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,925
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,531
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,336
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Poor
$91,668
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,091
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,847
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.5%
Poor
26.4%

White/Caucasian vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.9%), single male poverty (14.5% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.1%), and single father poverty (18.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%), male poverty (11.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.5%).
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricWhite/CaucasianLaotian
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Good
8.8%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Average
13.4%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.8%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
18.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Average
16.2%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.5%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.4%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

White/Caucasian vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.97%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.4%).
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricWhite/CaucasianLaotian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.2%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.9%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.1%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.4%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%

White/Caucasian vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.63%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.93%).
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricWhite/CaucasianLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.5%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.9%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.9%
Good
82.9%

White/Caucasian vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 16.8%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.43%), family households (65.1% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 47.4%, a difference of 2.5%).
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricWhite/CaucasianLaotian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.1%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.6%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Exceptional
28.5%

White/Caucasian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.23%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricWhite/CaucasianLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.8%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

White/Caucasian vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 36.3%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.3%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.2% compared to 86.5%, a difference of 0.33%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.8% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.55%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.65%).
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricWhite/CaucasianLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.3%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
91.8%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Good
86.2%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
44.2%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
35.3%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Poor
4.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Fair
1.8%
Exceptional
2.3%

White/Caucasian vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 1.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.1%).
White/Caucasian vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricWhite/CaucasianLaotian
Disability
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.3%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Excellent
2.4%