Cape Verdean vs Laotian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cape Verdean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cape Verdeans

Laotians

Poor
Good
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Laotian Integration in Cape Verdean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,236,642 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Laotians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to an increase of 45.5 Laotians.
Cape Verdean Integration in Laotian Communities

Cape Verdean vs Laotian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($50,077 compared to $66,306, a difference of 32.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $111,051, a difference of 26.8%), and median household income ($75,848 compared to $94,990, a difference of 25.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $54,369, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $42,133, a difference of 9.1%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 11.8%).
Cape Verdean vs Laotian Income
Income MetricCape VerdeanLaotian
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,935
Exceptional
$47,041
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,848
Exceptional
$112,859
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,848
Exceptional
$94,990
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,640
Exceptional
$50,343
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,103
Exceptional
$59,351
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,614
Exceptional
$42,133
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,387
Exceptional
$54,369
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$85,758
Exceptional
$104,993
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,580
Exceptional
$111,051
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,077
Exceptional
$66,306
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.6%
Poor
26.4%

Cape Verdean vs Laotian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 111.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 38.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 1.1%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.4%).
Cape Verdean vs Laotian Poverty
Poverty MetricCape VerdeanLaotian
Poverty
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Males
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
19.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.3%
Exceptional
12.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.1%
Exceptional
14.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.7%
Exceptional
14.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Males
Tragic
13.8%
Exceptional
11.9%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Exceptional
19.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.8%
Exceptional
27.0%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.7%
Good
10.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Fair
12.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.1%
Exceptional
10.0%

Cape Verdean vs Laotian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 43.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 38.6%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (7.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.5%).
Cape Verdean vs Laotian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCape VerdeanLaotian
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Good
5.2%
Males
Tragic
7.1%
Good
5.2%
Females
Tragic
5.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.9%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.5%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
6.6%
Excellent
4.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Good
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.5%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%

Cape Verdean vs Laotian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 79.6%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Cape Verdean vs Laotian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCape VerdeanLaotian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.6%
Exceptional
65.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.0%
Average
79.6%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
44.5%
Tragic
34.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.3%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.0%
Poor
84.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.8%
Poor
84.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Good
82.9%

Cape Verdean vs Laotian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 51.9%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 45.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.7%), and family households (61.8% compared to 65.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Cape Verdean vs Laotian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCape VerdeanLaotian
Family Households
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
65.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.9%
Exceptional
28.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
38.1%
Exceptional
48.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Excellent
3.26
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.9%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.9%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
39.6%
Excellent
47.4%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.3%
Exceptional
28.5%

Cape Verdean vs Laotian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 71.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 67.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 43.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 7.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 43.4%).
Cape Verdean vs Laotian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCape VerdeanLaotian
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
9.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.5%
Exceptional
91.0%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
46.8%
Exceptional
58.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
21.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.4%
Exceptional
7.4%

Cape Verdean vs Laotian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 59.5%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.0%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.88%), nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.89%).
Cape Verdean vs Laotian Education Level
Education Level MetricCape VerdeanLaotian
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Poor
2.2%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
97.7%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
97.6%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.5%
Poor
97.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Poor
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Tragic
95.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Fair
94.6%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Fair
93.6%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Average
92.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.4%
Good
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.1%
Good
89.3%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
80.9%
Excellent
86.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.0%
Exceptional
68.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.3%
Exceptional
62.8%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
49.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
42.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
17.0%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
2.3%

Cape Verdean vs Laotian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Laotian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 39.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 47.9%, a difference of 4.7%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.3%), and cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 11.2%).
Cape Verdean vs Laotian Disability
Disability MetricCape VerdeanLaotian
Disability
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
10.6%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
11.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
7.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.1%
Exceptional
10.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.1%
Poor
47.9%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.2%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.9%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Excellent
2.4%